irmion
ПомощьLog in Найдите инструмент

EDUCATION DECISION WORKBENCH

Assessment Accommodation Planner

Map access barriers to candidate supports without changing the construct or making an eligibility decision.

Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.

Learning inputs

Build the assessment accommodation planner

Enter the assessment, the exact construct, standard time, and mode. Add barrier rows and the supports already approved or awaiting team review. Use non-sensitive descriptions such as “dense instructions” rather than diagnoses or student names.

Generation uses only the information entered in this tab. It does not fetch sources or make student decisions.

Review output

Your learning artifact appears here

Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous, policy-approved information. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.

Transparent method

How the assessment accommodation planner works

Each barrier is classified as access, response, or environment. The tool matches only supports marked “yes” in the same class. Unmatched barriers stay unresolved. It does not calculate an accommodation, infer disability, or recommend a legal decision. A mapped row means there is a candidate support to review. The team must confirm authorization, learner preference, implementation details, and whether the support preserves the knowledge or skill being measured.

  1. 01
    Before generation

    Confirm the assessment purpose, construct, standard conditions, and authorized decision process.

  2. 02
    During review

    Review each mapping for construct relevance and practical implementation.

  3. 03
    Before use

    Record only the authorized plan in the approved system and communicate it to responsible staff.

How to interpret the result

Assessment Accommodation Planner

Before generation

Use this planner before adapting an assessment when the team needs to distinguish the intended construct from barriers created by directions, response mode, timing, or environment. It creates an auditable conversation map; it never establishes eligibility.

Worked example

For a 50-minute science explanation, the example maps dense instructions to plain-language directions, sustained handwriting to speech-to-text review, and background noise to a low-distraction setting. The shared construct remains explaining how evidence supports a scientific claim.

Formula or methodology

Each barrier is classified as access, response, or environment. The tool matches only supports marked “yes” in the same class. Unmatched barriers stay unresolved. It does not calculate an accommodation, infer disability, or recommend a legal decision.

How to interpret the result

A mapped row means there is a candidate support to review. The team must confirm authorization, learner preference, implementation details, and whether the support preserves the knowledge or skill being measured.

Common mistakes

Do not paste IEP records, diagnoses, or names. Do not treat extra time as the default solution. Do not remove a task feature when that feature is part of the construct. Rehearse approved assistive technology before assessment day.

CAST UDL Guidelines 3.0 and UDL on Campus assessment guidance

Learning boundary

Planning support is not an eligibility decision

Only the authorized school team can approve accommodations under the applicable plan, policy, and jurisdiction. This browser-local worksheet must not contain unnecessary disability or health information.

Review checklist

Human review before educational use

  • The construct is written separately from the response method.
  • Every support has a documented approval status.
  • Implementation preserves security and comparability where required.
  • The authorized team reviews and records the final decision.

Practical questions

Assessment Accommodation Planner questions

Does this decide which accommodation a learner receives?

No. It organizes supplied barriers and approved supports for team review.

Can a support change the assessed construct?

If it changes the knowledge or skill being measured, the team must treat that as a validity issue and follow policy.

Does Nirmion store the entries?

The staged tool calculates in the current browser tab and does not send field values to the API.