irmion
AjudaLog in Encontre uma ferramenta

EDUCATION DECISION WORKBENCH

Formative Assessment Planner

Create a timed evidence cycle that links misconceptions, learner responses, and immediate instructional decisions.

Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.

Learning inputs

Build the formative assessment planner

State one observable learning target, the grade band, period length, aggregate class size, response mode, and evidence-backed misconceptions. Avoid learner names and fixed labels.

Generation uses only the information entered in this tab. It does not fetch sources or make student decisions.

Review output

Your learning artifact appears here

Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous, policy-approved information. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.

Transparent method

How the formative assessment planner works

The schedule allocates 10%, 15%, 35%, 15%, 15%, and 10% of available minutes to activation, first check, instruction, midpoint check, response, and exit evidence. Largest-remainder rounding preserves the exact lesson total. The plan is useful only when each check changes what happens next. A class-level pattern can justify a new explanation; one response should not become a consequential learner judgment.

  1. 01
    Before generation

    Make the target and success evidence explicit.

  2. 02
    During review

    Sample responses broadly and apply the stated decision rule.

  3. 03
    Before use

    Use the exit evidence to plan the next learning step, not to label learners.

How to interpret the result

Formative Assessment Planner

Before generation

Use the planner before a lesson when quick checks need a clear purpose and a response rule. It places evidence before, during, and after instruction so the teacher can choose reteach, practice, extension, or a different representation.

Worked example

For a 55-minute fractions lesson, the sequence probes the belief that larger denominators always make larger fractions, checks understanding after modeling, and ends with an individual comparison using visual and numerical evidence.

Formula or methodology

The schedule allocates 10%, 15%, 35%, 15%, 15%, and 10% of available minutes to activation, first check, instruction, midpoint check, response, and exit evidence. Largest-remainder rounding preserves the exact lesson total.

How to interpret the result

The plan is useful only when each check changes what happens next. A class-level pattern can justify a new explanation; one response should not become a consequential learner judgment.

Common mistakes

Avoid asking only recall questions, collecting evidence without acting, grading every check, exposing individual responses publicly, or using a response format that adds an irrelevant barrier.

CAST UDL Guidelines: action, expression, and progress monitoring

Learning boundary

Quick evidence is not a final judgment

A formative response is context-bound and incomplete. Use multiple accessible evidence sources and qualified educator judgment.

Review checklist

Human review before educational use

  • Every prompt targets the stated outcome.
  • Misconceptions come from evidence or experience.
  • Response modes are accessible.
  • Each check has a teaching decision.

Practical questions

Formative Assessment Planner questions

How many checks should a lesson include?

The example uses three explicit checks; use only enough to support real decisions.

Should formative checks be graded?

Often they work best as low-stakes evidence. Follow local policy and tell learners how evidence will be used.

Can I use group responses?

Yes, but include individual evidence before making conclusions about individuals.