Create a timed evidence cycle that links misconceptions, learner responses, and immediate instructional decisions.
Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.
02
Review output
Your learning artifact appears here
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous, policy-approved information. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
How the formative assessment planner works
The schedule allocates 10%, 15%, 35%, 15%, 15%, and 10% of available minutes to activation, first check, instruction, midpoint check, response, and exit evidence. Largest-remainder rounding preserves the exact lesson total. The plan is useful only when each check changes what happens next. A class-level pattern can justify a new explanation; one response should not become a consequential learner judgment.
01
Before generation
Make the target and success evidence explicit.
02
During review
Sample responses broadly and apply the stated decision rule.
03
Before use
Use the exit evidence to plan the next learning step, not to label learners.
How to interpret the result
Formative Assessment Planner
Before generation
Use the planner before a lesson when quick checks need a clear purpose and a response rule. It places evidence before, during, and after instruction so the teacher can choose reteach, practice, extension, or a different representation.
Worked example
For a 55-minute fractions lesson, the sequence probes the belief that larger denominators always make larger fractions, checks understanding after modeling, and ends with an individual comparison using visual and numerical evidence.
Formula or methodology
The schedule allocates 10%, 15%, 35%, 15%, 15%, and 10% of available minutes to activation, first check, instruction, midpoint check, response, and exit evidence. Largest-remainder rounding preserves the exact lesson total.
How to interpret the result
The plan is useful only when each check changes what happens next. A class-level pattern can justify a new explanation; one response should not become a consequential learner judgment.
Common mistakes
Avoid asking only recall questions, collecting evidence without acting, grading every check, exposing individual responses publicly, or using a response format that adds an irrelevant barrier.