Solve bounded linear-over-linear equations, enforce denominator restrictions, and audit learner solutions by direct substitution.
Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.
02
Review output
Your learning artifact appears here
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous classroom or laboratory evidence. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
How the rational equation validation misconception diagnostic works
Cross multiply ax+b = k(x-c), collect (a-k)x = -kc-b, and calculate x = (-kc-b)/(a-k). Reject the structural case a=k in this bounded tool. Then require x different from c and substitute the learner value into the original left side. A response needs expected-value agreement, domain validity, and a residual no larger than tolerance. Supported means the entered value solves the original equation under the declared tolerance and is not excluded. A restricted entry shows why algebraic manipulation alone is insufficient. A residual conflict can identify rounding or input issues. Review the original domain before multiplying, show equivalent steps, retain exact fractions where required, and consider no-solution or identity cases with a broader method.
01
Before generation
Confirm the learning question, authoritative source, units, notation, response coding, model assumptions, and review threshold. Keep an unchanged copy of the original evidence and remove learner names or identifiers.
02
During review
Run the worked example first, inspect every intermediate row, and compare it with a hand calculation, diagram, representation, or approved subject method. Correct input evidence before interpreting a flag.
03
Before use
Record the method, assumptions, units, classifications, and flagged rows. Verify the editable report independently, connect the numerical signal with learner reasoning, and document any teaching or laboratory decision outside this tool.
Use after a learner has solved this bounded family of rational equations and needs independent validation of algebra and domain. The report shows the symbolic model, restriction, expected solution, and substitution residual. It does not parse arbitrary notation, handle several rational terms, classify identities when a equals k, preserve exact symbolic fractions, or replace written transformation reasoning.
Worked example
Equation A solves to eight thirds and passes substitution within tolerance. Equation B solves to 1.5 and Equation C to zero. The final row has denominator restriction x different from 2 but the learner enters 2; the report blocks direct division, labels the restricted value, and shows the expected valid solution negative 2.5.
Formula or methodology
Cross multiply ax+b = k(x-c), collect (a-k)x = -kc-b, and calculate x = (-kc-b)/(a-k). Reject the structural case a=k in this bounded tool. Then require x different from c and substitute the learner value into the original left side. A response needs expected-value agreement, domain validity, and a residual no larger than tolerance.
How to interpret the result
Supported means the entered value solves the original equation under the declared tolerance and is not excluded. A restricted entry shows why algebraic manipulation alone is insufficient. A residual conflict can identify rounding or input issues. Review the original domain before multiplying, show equivalent steps, retain exact fractions where required, and consider no-solution or identity cases with a broader method.
Common mistakes
Do not multiply only the numerator by k, distribute negative c incorrectly, divide by a-k when it is zero, cancel a term across addition, forget x=c after a factor disappears, accept a value produced by transformed work without substitution, or round before checking. State restrictions first and test candidates in the original equation.
This browser-local workbench applies only the disclosed rules. It cannot diagnose a learner, certify an experiment, establish assessment validity, or replace teacher, laboratory, curriculum, accessibility, and safety judgment.
Review checklist
Human review before educational use
Every entered value, unit, label, and response matches the approved source evidence.
The disclosed model matches the intended curriculum question and evidence type.
Intermediate calculations, restrictions, and conflicts have been inspected rather than using only the headline.
A teacher or learner verifies the report independently and records corrections, limitations, and next steps.