Expand two entered linear factors and locate leading, middle, or constant coefficient conflicts against a target quadratic.
Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.
02
Review output
Your learning artifact appears here
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous classroom or laboratory evidence. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
How the polynomial factorization misconception diagnostic works
Expanding px plus q times rx plus s gives pr x squared plus ps plus qr times x plus qs. The tool compares pr with A, ps plus qr with B, and qs with C separately. Full support requires all three equalities, making a sign or omitted cross product visible instead of returning only a single incorrect label. Supported means the entered factors multiply exactly to the target quadratic. A middle-only conflict often indicates missing or miscombined cross products, while a constant conflict points to q times s. Review greatest common factors, sign arrangements, factor order, chosen number system, zero-product use, and whether the original polynomial is in standard form.
01
Before generation
Confirm the question, source, units, notation, response coding, model assumptions, and review threshold. Keep an unchanged copy of the original evidence.
02
During review
Run the worked example, inspect every intermediate row, and compare it with a hand calculation, diagram, representation, or approved subject method.
03
Before use
Record the method, assumptions, units, classifications, and flagged rows. Verify the editable report independently before educational or laboratory use.
How to interpret the result
Polynomial Factorization Misconception Diagnostic
Before generation
Use when a learner has proposed two linear factors and the teacher needs visible evidence about which coefficient fails after expansion. The diagnostic checks integer coefficients and exact algebraic equivalence. It does not find factors, decide irreducibility, extract a greatest common factor, solve roots, accept higher-degree expressions, or assess the reasoning used to propose them.
Worked example
The difference-of-squares factors expand to x squared minus nine. The monic and nonmonic examples reproduce all target coefficients, including the two cross products for the middle term. The final factors x plus one and x plus four expand to x squared plus five x plus four rather than the target x squared plus six x plus eight, so they are flagged.
Formula or methodology
Expanding px plus q times rx plus s gives pr x squared plus ps plus qr times x plus qs. The tool compares pr with A, ps plus qr with B, and qs with C separately. Full support requires all three equalities, making a sign or omitted cross product visible instead of returning only a single incorrect label.
How to interpret the result
Supported means the entered factors multiply exactly to the target quadratic. A middle-only conflict often indicates missing or miscombined cross products, while a constant conflict points to q times s. Review greatest common factors, sign arrangements, factor order, chosen number system, zero-product use, and whether the original polynomial is in standard form.
Common mistakes
Do not multiply only first and last terms, add q and s for the constant, omit one cross product, assume two numbers that multiply to C always solve a nonmonic quadratic, lose a negative sign, or stop without expanding. Distribute every term, combine the middle coefficients, and compare all three target coefficients.
This browser-local workbench applies only the disclosed rules. It cannot diagnose a learner, certify an experiment, or replace teacher, laboratory, and safety judgment.
Review checklist
Human review before educational use
Every entered value, unit, label, and response matches the approved source evidence.
The disclosed model matches the intended curriculum question and evidence type.
Intermediate rows and conflicts have been inspected rather than using only the headline.
A teacher or learner verifies the report independently and records corrections.