Before generation
Use this planner when every learner or team should receive structured peer feedback across one or more rounds and manual pairing would create repeats or overlook constraints.
EDUCATION DECISION WORKBENCH
Peer Assessment Pairing Planner
Create repeat-aware, exclusion-aware peer-review rounds from anonymous aliases with every conflict visible for teacher review.
Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.
Review output
Your learning artifact appears here
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous, policy-approved information. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
How the peer assessment pairing planner works
The circle method fixes one alias and rotates the others between rounds. Each unordered pair is tracked. Exclusions are checked in both directions. Odd participant counts receive a BYE row. A usable row satisfies mechanical pairing rules. It does not prove that a pair is safe, equitable, accessible, or pedagogically appropriate. The teacher reviews every assignment.
- 01Before generation
Create anonymous aliases and define the review task.
- 02During review
Review conflicts and assign accessible materials.
- 03Before use
Monitor feedback quality and rotate opportunities fairly.
How to interpret the result
Peer Assessment Pairing Planner
Worked example
Six fictional teams complete two reciprocal review rounds. Two exclusions are supplied. The tool rotates aliases using a round-robin schedule and marks any exclusion or repeated pair for manual reassignment.
Formula or methodology
The circle method fixes one alias and rotates the others between rounds. Each unordered pair is tracked. Exclusions are checked in both directions. Odd participant counts receive a BYE row.
How to interpret the result
A usable row satisfies mechanical pairing rules. It does not prove that a pair is safe, equitable, accessible, or pedagogically appropriate. The teacher reviews every assignment.
Common mistakes
Do not use names, behavior labels, disability information, or secret social rankings. Do not leave absent learners unhandled. Provide a rubric, examples, feedback norms, and a private route to raise concerns.
Learning boundary
Pairing is a safeguarding decision
The algorithm balances rounds only. An accountable educator must review relationships, consent, accessibility, absences, and safeguarding concerns.
Review checklist
Human review before educational use
- Aliases contain no personal identifiers.
- Exclusions are authorized and necessary.
- Every conflict is manually resolved.
- Learners receive feedback criteria and support.
Practical questions
Peer Assessment Pairing Planner questions
Can the tool guarantee no repeated pair?
It detects repeats in the generated rounds and marks unresolved conflicts.
What happens with an odd number?
One alias receives a BYE in that round and needs another meaningful role.
Does it rank learners?
No. The planner uses aliases only to organize review assignments.