STEM PRACTICE AND EVIDENCE WORKBENCH
Group rubric evidence by explanation and audit criterion coverage, essential elements, and consistent ready or review claims.
Review output
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous classroom or laboratory evidence. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
Group rows by normalized explanation. Coverage percentage equals criteria marked present divided by all entered criteria times 100. Ready requires coverage at or above the declared threshold, at least one criterion marked essential, and every essential criterion marked present. Every row carrying the explanation must use the same ready or review claim that follows those conditions. Supported means the entered rubric marks and claim are internally consistent. It does not validate scientific content, coherence, evidence quality, or authorship. A missing optional element may still matter for a particular audience, while complete boxes can accompany weak reasoning. Return to the explanation, source data, rubric definitions, counterevidence, uncertainty, accessibility, and disciplinary expectations.
Confirm the learning question, authoritative source, units, notation, response coding, model assumptions, and review threshold. Keep an unchanged copy of the original evidence and remove learner names or identifiers.
Run the worked example first, inspect every intermediate row, and compare it with a hand calculation, diagram, representation, or approved subject method. Correct input evidence before interpreting a flag.
Record the method, assumptions, units, classifications, and flagged rows. Verify the editable report independently, connect the numerical signal with learner reasoning, and document any teaching or laboratory decision outside this tool.
How to interpret the result
Use during formative review, moderation, self-assessment, or rubric design when reviewers need to see exactly which explanation elements are present. The analyzer combines an overall coverage threshold with a safeguard for essential criteria. It does not read or fact-check prose, decide whether evidence is relevant, infer causal reasoning, award a grade, detect plagiarism, or establish scientific validity.
Plant growth contains claim, evidence, and reasoning, with uncertainty absent but optional. Coverage is 75 percent and every essential criterion is present, so ready is supported. Force model lacks essential reasoning and correctly says review. Review claim has the same ready evidence pattern as the first explanation but is labeled review, so its repeated claim conflicts with the disclosed rule.
Group rows by normalized explanation. Coverage percentage equals criteria marked present divided by all entered criteria times 100. Ready requires coverage at or above the declared threshold, at least one criterion marked essential, and every essential criterion marked present. Every row carrying the explanation must use the same ready or review claim that follows those conditions.
Supported means the entered rubric marks and claim are internally consistent. It does not validate scientific content, coherence, evidence quality, or authorship. A missing optional element may still matter for a particular audience, while complete boxes can accompany weak reasoning. Return to the explanation, source data, rubric definitions, counterevidence, uncertainty, accessibility, and disciplinary expectations.
Do not confuse mentioning data with using relevant evidence, treat a conclusion as causal reasoning, make every criterion essential, lower a threshold to approve a response, enter inconsistent claims for one explanation, or convert the percentage directly into a grade. Calibrate reviewers with examples, preserve comments, check factual accuracy, and give an actionable revision path.
Learning boundary
This browser-local workbench applies only the disclosed rules. It cannot diagnose a learner, certify an experiment, establish assessment validity, or replace teacher, laboratory, curriculum, accessibility, and safety judgment.
Review checklist
Practical questions
No. Processing occurs in the current browser tab. Avoid personal information and retain authoritative records only in the approved school system.
No. It describes entered evidence under one disclosed rule. Review reasoning, uncertainty, access, and several evidence sources.
Treat it as an editable calculation aid. Show your own reasoning, cite required sources, and follow course and academic-integrity rules.
YOUR NIRMION
