Calculate two-isotope weighted means and audit abundance totals and reported average-mass claims with visible contributions.
Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.
02
Review output
Your learning artifact appears here
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous classroom or laboratory evidence. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
How the isotope abundance reasoning evidence analysis workbench works
Weighted mean equals mass A times abundance A divided by one hundred plus mass B times abundance B divided by one hundred. Abundances must total 100 percent within 0.05 percentage points. Claim agreement uses an absolute 0.01 u tolerance after calculation at full precision. A supported row has a complete abundance total and a reported value close to the weighted mean. The average should lie between included isotope masses and nearer the more abundant isotope. An invalid total means the composition must be corrected or completed before the average can represent the sample.
01
Before generation
Confirm the task, approved source, units, notation, signs, model assumptions, and review threshold. Keep an unchanged copy of measurements or learner responses.
02
During review
Run the worked example, inspect every intermediate row, and compare the result with a hand calculation, diagram, physical model, periodic table, or approved laboratory method.
03
Before use
Record the method, assumptions, uncertainty, units, classifications, and flagged rows. Verify the editable report independently before instruction, assessment, or laboratory use.
Use for a bounded two-isotope weighted-average exercise or data review. It does not handle a third isotope, solve an unknown abundance, identify a sample, distinguish natural from enriched material, model instrument peaks, or propagate mass-spectrometry uncertainty. Real elements require all relevant isotope evidence.
Worked example
The chlorine and copper rows reproduce familiar weighted averages within 0.01 u. An equal fictional mixture produces exactly 11.0 u. The final row has abundances totaling only ninety percent; even though a number can be calculated, the claim is not supported because ten percent of the composition is missing.
Formula or methodology
Weighted mean equals mass A times abundance A divided by one hundred plus mass B times abundance B divided by one hundred. Abundances must total 100 percent within 0.05 percentage points. Claim agreement uses an absolute 0.01 u tolerance after calculation at full precision.
How to interpret the result
A supported row has a complete abundance total and a reported value close to the weighted mean. The average should lie between included isotope masses and nearer the more abundant isotope. An invalid total means the composition must be corrected or completed before the average can represent the sample.
Common mistakes
Do not average isotope masses without weights, use mass numbers in place of measured isotopic masses, enter percentages as whole multipliers, round each contribution early, or force an incomplete total to one hundred without evidence. Record the source, sample basis, precision, and all relevant isotopes.
This browser-local workbench applies only the disclosed rules. It cannot diagnose learning, certify an experiment, identify a substance, establish a structure, or replace teacher, laboratory, and safety judgment.
Review checklist
Human review before educational use
Every value, symbol, unit, classification, and response matches the source evidence.
The disclosed model matches the course method and intended question.
Intermediate rows and conflicts have been inspected rather than using only the headline.
A teacher or learner verifies the report independently and records corrections.