Before generation
Use after force, mass, and acceleration evidence have been collected for a bounded one-dimensional investigation. The workbench separates the expected F divided by m calculation from agreement with observed acceleration. It does not sum force vectors, infer mass, correct a sensor, fit changing acceleration, decide uncertainty, or prove that a system boundary is appropriate.
Worked example
A four-newton net force on a two-kilogram cart predicts two metres per second squared and the observed 2.02 falls inside three percent. A negative force correctly predicts negative acceleration. The loaded cart observation differs enough to support inconsistent. The final row reverses acceleration sign but claims consistency, so it is flagged.
Formula or methodology
Expected signed acceleration equals net external force divided by positive system mass. Percentage residual equals absolute observed minus expected acceleration divided by expected magnitude times one hundred. Observed evidence is locally consistent when the residual does not exceed the entered tolerance; learner acceleration is checked independently against the expected value.
How to interpret the result
Supported means the learner calculation and the consistency classification both agree with the supplied force, mass, observation, and tolerance. A mismatch can indicate sign, net-force, mass, unit, timing, or measurement problems. Review a free-body diagram, vector components, friction, uncertainty, sampling interval, system boundary, and whether acceleration is approximately constant.
Common mistakes
Do not divide mass by force, discard a negative direction, use one applied force instead of net force, mix grams and kilograms, compare acceleration before sensors are synchronized, choose tolerance after seeing the result, or call any nonzero force inconsistent. Resolve the net force first, preserve units, calculate independently, and justify uncertainty.