Apply a bounded VSEPR domain table and audit electron-domain and molecular-geometry predictions.
Runs in this browser tabEditable downloadUp to 500 structured rows and 30,000 characters per field. Use anonymous or fictional labels.
02
Review output
Your learning artifact appears here
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous classroom or laboratory evidence. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
How the molecular geometry prediction concept diagnostic works
Total electron domains equal bonded domains plus central-atom lone-pair domains. Two, three, four, five, and six domains map to linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, and octahedral electron geometries. A bounded lookup then names molecular geometry after lone-pair positions are omitted. A supported prediction agrees with both lookup stages for the supplied counts. It does not validate the counts or account for distortions. Ask learners to connect the Lewis structure, repulsion model, three-dimensional arrangement, approximate angles, and molecular polarity rather than memorizing a final name alone.
01
Before generation
Confirm the question, approved source, units, notation, signs, response coding, model assumptions, and review threshold. Keep an unchanged copy of measurements or learner evidence.
02
During review
Run the worked example, inspect every intermediate row, and compare the result with a hand calculation, diagram, representation, periodic table, or approved laboratory method.
03
Before use
Record the method, assumptions, uncertainty, units, classifications, and flagged rows. Verify the editable report independently before instruction, assessment, or laboratory use.
How to interpret the result
Molecular Geometry Prediction Concept Diagnostic
Before generation
Use for common main-group VSEPR cases with two through six total domains. The diagnostic distinguishes electron-domain geometry from the shape named after atom positions. It does not draw Lewis structures, infer domain counts from a formula, predict exact angles, handle every transition-metal complex, or prove measured structure.
Worked example
Carbon dioxide is linear in both classifications. Water has tetrahedral electron geometry and bent molecular geometry, ammonia is trigonal pyramidal, and sulfur hexafluoride is octahedral. A methane row claims square planar for four bonded domains and no lone pairs, so both predictions are flagged.
Formula or methodology
Total electron domains equal bonded domains plus central-atom lone-pair domains. Two, three, four, five, and six domains map to linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, and octahedral electron geometries. A bounded lookup then names molecular geometry after lone-pair positions are omitted.
How to interpret the result
A supported prediction agrees with both lookup stages for the supplied counts. It does not validate the counts or account for distortions. Ask learners to connect the Lewis structure, repulsion model, three-dimensional arrangement, approximate angles, and molecular polarity rather than memorizing a final name alone.
Common mistakes
Do not count a double bond as two domains, include terminal-atom lone pairs in the central count, call electron geometry and molecular geometry identical in every case, or infer polarity from shape without bond dipoles. Verify resonance, expanded octets, radicals, and course-specific exceptions.
This browser-local workbench applies only the disclosed rules. It cannot diagnose a learner, certify an experiment, establish a chemical structure, or replace teacher, laboratory, and safety judgment.
Review checklist
Human review before educational use
Every value, symbol, unit, classification, and response matches the source evidence.
The disclosed model matches the course method and intended question.
Intermediate rows and conflicts have been inspected rather than using only the headline.
A teacher or learner verifies the report independently and records corrections.