Before generation
Use this when learners need different representation, scaffolding, practice, or transfer challenge while the class works toward the same core outcome.
EDUCATION DECISION WORKBENCH
Create flexible access, core, and extension paths around one shared learning goal with explicit movement rules.
Review output
Load the worked example to inspect realistic inputs, or enter anonymous, policy-approved information. Results remain in this browser tab until you copy or download them.
Transparent method
The tool creates three planning paths: access reduces irrelevant barriers, core targets the shared evidence, and extension increases transfer or complexity. It does not assign learners automatically. Paths are temporary options. Review whether the access path preserves challenge, the extension deepens learning, and every learner can move based on current evidence and choice.
Collect current evidence and define shared success.
Offer flexible routes and monitor movement evidence.
Compare outcomes and revise barriers, supports, and challenge.
How to interpret the result
Use this when learners need different representation, scaffolding, practice, or transfer challenge while the class works toward the same core outcome.
The proportional-relationships example offers visual unit-rate support, a core table-to-graph task, and an extension comparing two models. Movement depends on fresh evidence rather than permanent groups.
The tool creates three planning paths: access reduces irrelevant barriers, core targets the shared evidence, and extension increases transfer or complexity. It does not assign learners automatically.
Paths are temporary options. Review whether the access path preserves challenge, the extension deepens learning, and every learner can move based on current evidence and choice.
Do not make the access path easier by removing the goal, use more work as extension, create visible low groups, or infer readiness from identity or historical labels.
Learning boundary
Use current evidence, learner voice, accessible materials, and flexible movement. Do not expose group labels or lower expectations.
Review checklist
Practical questions
It should reduce an irrelevant barrier while preserving the intended learning challenge.
Offer choices and supports without fixed ability labels or public ranking.
Yes. Paths are flexible resources, not permanent placements.
YOUR NIRMION