Calculate the uncorrected Pearson chi-square statistic for a two-by-two contingency table. Review the symbolic equation, substituted values, interpretation boundary, and result in one guided workspace.
01 Calculated in this tab
02 Values stay in this browser tab
03 Use boundary
OBSERVED VS EXPECTED / 2X2 TABLE
See which cells are driving the chi-square statistic
Use this explainer when you need to audit a 2x2 table rather than stop at one test statistic. With the reviewed default counts a = 3, b = 2, c = 15, and d = 35, the calculator returns chi-square = 9.09090909 with 1 degree of freedom. The sections below show the row totals, column totals, expected counts, and cell-by-cell contributions behind that result.
Worked default example
Entered counts
Observed counts: a = 3, b = 2, c = 15, d = 35.
Row and column totals
Top row = 5, bottom row = 5, left column = 45, right column = 55, grand total = 1.
Expected counts under independence
Expected a = 22.5, b = 27.5, c = 22.5, d = 27.5. The smallest expected count is 22.5.
2x2 shortcut formula
The calculator's direct formula path is 1 x (3 x 35 - 2 x 15)^2 / [(5)(5)(45)(55)] = 9.09090909.
Equivalent Pearson sum
The same result also appears as (3 - 22.5)^2 / 22.5 + (2 - 27.5)^2 / 27.5 + (15 - 22.5)^2 / 22.5 + (35 - 27.5)^2 / 27.5 = 9.09090909.
What to enter and how to read the result
Enter four observed counts from one 2x2 contingency table. The main result card reports the uncorrected Pearson chi-square statistic, and the first supporting metric reports the degrees of freedom, which stays 1 for every 2x2 table. This page does not label your categories, calculate a p-value, or switch to a continuity-corrected or exact test.
What the calculator actually does
Nirmion evaluates the 2x2 shortcut formula n(ad-bc)^2 / [(a+b)(c+d)(a+c)(b+d)], which is algebraically equivalent to the usual sum of (observed - expected)^2 / expected across all four cells. In the reviewed default example, the largest contributions come from cells a and c at 2.5 each, while cells b and d contribute 2.045455 each, adding to chi-square = 9.09090909.
Where this model stops helping
Use raw counts, not percentages, rates, or rounded shares. The observations should be independent, and expected counts that are small, commonly below 5, weaken this uncorrected Pearson approximation. When that happens, consider Fisher's exact test, a continuity correction, or a fuller hypothesis-test workflow outside this calculator.
Reference and next checks
The linked OpenStax section explains the general chi-square test of independence, including expected-count construction and degrees of freedom. If you want a follow-up percentage check, a standard-score comparison, or a spread measure for numeric data, continue with the related calculators below.
Longer bars mark larger cell contributions to chi-square. In this example, cells a and c contribute more than b and d.
The table turns one statistic into an audit trail: observed counts, expected counts, marginal totals, and each cell's share of chi-square = 9.09090909.
No. Enter the observed counts in each cell. Percentages or rates lose the sample size that the chi-square statistic depends on.
Why is the degrees-of-freedom value always 1 here?
A 2x2 contingency table always has (2 - 1)(2 - 1) = 1 degree of freedom. Once the row totals and column totals are fixed, only one cell count can vary freely.
When should I avoid using this result by itself?
Do not stop at this number when the data are paired, the observations are not independent, or expected counts are small. This page also does not return a p-value, Yates correction, or Fisher exact result.
Use boundary
Calculation path
Calculate the uncorrected Pearson chi-square statistic for a two-by-two contingency table. The page evaluates the displayed equation from your supplied values and presents both symbolic and substituted KaTeX working so the arithmetic can be checked.
Calculation path
chi^2=n(ad-bc)^2/[(a+b)(c+d)(a+c)(b+d)]
What you provide
What you provide
Cell a count, using the same scenario as the other inputs
Cell b count, using the same scenario as the other inputs
Cell c count, using the same scenario as the other inputs
Cell d count, using the same scenario as the other inputs
What you receive
What you receive
Chi-square statistic from the stated equation
A symbolic formula plus substituted working with your values
Visible assumptions, field guidance, and an authoritative learning reference
Use boundary
Choose the maximum decimal places shown. This does not increase source accuracy.
Interpret the result only when the sampling design, independence, distribution, and measurement assumptions fit the data.
Use internally consistent units and retain extra precision when carrying the result into another calculation.